Job Insecurity, Financial Threat, and Mental Health in the COVID-19 Context: The Moderating Role of the Support Network

The aim of this study is two-fold. Firstly, to analyze the relations between the perceptions of job insecurity and financial threat and general mental health during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. And secondly, to identify the potential moderating effect of the support network. We carried out a cross-sectional study on a non-probabilistic sample aimed at a general Chilean adult population to analyze this. The results show that both job insecurity (β = −.183;p < .001) and financial threat (β = −.309;p < .001) are associated with a decline in general mental health. Likewise, the results indicated a positive relationship between support network and general mental health in the two models analyzed (βs = 0.322 and 0.182;ps < 0.001 and = 0.012, respectively), as well as a moderating effect of support network on the relationship between job insecurity and decreased general mental health (β = .232;p < .001). The theoretical and applied scope of these findings are analyzed, and their challenges and limitations are discussed.

Fluid Overload is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19 and Acute Kidney Injury (preprint)

Introduction: Acute kidney injury (AKI) has been associated with adverse outcomes among hospitalized patients with Covid-19. Although pre-pandemic data of patients with AKI has shown that volume overload is significantly associated with mortality and need for Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT), the association with worst outcomes among patients with AKI and Covid-19 has not been studied. Thus, the purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of fluid overload in AKI with progression of the disease and mortality among patients hospitalized with Covid-19. Methods Observational retrospective cohort study that included volume balances, clinical and biochemical data of 412 hospitalized patients with Covid-19 and AKI. Univariate and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the association of fluid overload with 28-day mortality, AKI stage 3 and RRT. Results The mean age of the subjects was 55 ± 15 years, 64.1% were women, 69.7% developed AKI at any stage, 47.2% had diabetes, 31.4% had hypertension, and only 4.5% had chronic kidney disease. Likewise, the 28-day mortality was 20.4%, 43.3% patients required mechanical ventilation, 22.3% developed AKI stage 3, and 9.5% needed RRT. The median of global fluid overload was 1441cc (-489 to 3736), and 59.7% had a global fluid overload of > 1000 cc at discharge. After Cox regression analysis the risk for 28-day mortality, AKI stage 3 and RRT was HR = 3.014 (1.573–5.777), 3.159 (1.708–5.840), and 3.607 (1.128–11.539), respectively (p 

Open label phase I/II clinical trial and predicted efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 RBD protein vaccines SOBERANA 02 and SOBERANA Plus in children (preprint)

ObjectivesTo evaluate heterologous scheme in children 3-18 y/o using two SARS-CoV-2 r-RBD protein vaccines. MethodsA phase I/II open-label, adaptive and multicenter trial evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of two doses of SOBERANA02 and a heterologous third dose of SOBERANA Plus in 350 children 3-18 y/o in Havana Cuba. Primary outcomes were safety (in phase I) and safety/immunogenicity (in phase II) measured by anti-RBD IgG ELISA, molecular and live-virus neutralization tests and specific T-cells response. An immunobridging and prediction of efficacy were additional analysis. ResultsLocal pain was the unique adverse event with >10% frequency, none was serious or severe. Two doses of SOBERANA 02 elicited humoral immune response similar to natural infection; the third dose increased significantly the response in all children, similar to that achieved in vaccinated young adults and higher than in convalescents children. The neutralizing titer was evaluated in a participants subset: all had neutralizing antibodies vs. alpha and delta; 97.9% vs. beta. GMT was 173.8 (CI 95% 131.7; 229.5) vs. alpha, 142 (CI 95% 101.3; 198.9) vs. delta and 24.8 (CI 95% 16.8; 36.6) vs. beta. An efficacy over 90% was estimated. ConclusionHeterologous scheme was safe and immunogenic in children 3-18 y/o. Trial registry: https://rpcec.sld.cu/trials/RPCEC00000374

Safety and immunogenicity of anti-SARS CoV-2 conjugate vaccine SOBERANA 02 in a two-dose or three-dose heterologous scheme in adults: Phase IIb Clinical Trial (preprint)

Background: We report results of immunogenicity, safety and reactogenicity of SOBERANA 02 in a two-dose or three-dose heterologous scheme in adults in a phase IIb clinical trial. Method: This phase IIb trial was designed as parallel, multicentre, adaptive, double blind, randomized and placebo-controlled. Subjects (N=810) aged 19-80 years were randomized to receive two doses of the recombinant SARS CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) conjugated to tetanus toxoid (SOBERANA 02) and a third dose of dimeric RBD (SOBERANA Plus) 28 days apart; two production batches of active ingredient of SOBERANA 02 were evaluated. Primary outcome was the percentage of seroconverted subjects with [≥]4-fold the anti-RBD IgG concentration. Secondary outcomes were safety, reactogenicity and neutralizing antibodies. Results: Seroconversion rate in vaccinees was respectively 76.3 and 96.8% after two or three doses, compared with 7.3% in placebo group. Anti-RBD IgG increased significantly after first and second dose of SOBERANA 02 respect to placebo group; and the third dose with SOBERANA Plus boosts the response compared to the second dose. Neutralizing IgG antibodies were detected against D614G and VOCs , {beta} and {delta}. Specific and functional antibodies were detected until 7-8 months after the third dose. The frequency of serious adverse events (AEs) associated with vaccination was very low (0.1%); with only one serious AE consistent with vaccination. Local pain was the most frequent AE. Conclusions: Two doses of SOBERANA 02 were well tolerated, safe an immunogenic in adults aged 19-80 years old. The heterologous combination with a third dose of SOBERANA Plus increased neutralizing antibodies, detectable 7-8 months after the third dose. Trial registry: https://rpcec.sld.cu/trials/RPCEC00000347

Safety and Immunogenicity of anti-SARS CoV-2 vaccine SOBERANA 02 in homologous or heterologous scheme. (preprint)

Background SOBERANA 02 is a COVID19 conjugate vaccine candidate based on SARS CoV2 recombinant RBD conjugated to tetanus toxoid. SOBERANA Plus antigen is dimericRBD. Here we report safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity from phase I and IIa clinical trials using two doses SOBERANA 02 (homologous protocol) and three doses (homologous) or heterologous (with SOBERANA Plus) protocols. Method We performed an open label, monocentric, sequential and adaptive phase I for evaluating safety, reactogenicity and exploring immunogenicity of SOBERANA 02 in two formulations (15 and 25 microg) in 40 subjects, 19 to 59 years old. Phase IIa was open label including 100 volunteers 19 to 80 years, receiving two doses of SOBERANA 02 25 microg. In both trials, half of volunteers received a third dose of SOBERANA 02, half received a heterologous dose of SOBERANA Plus 50 microg. Primary outcomes were safety and reactogenicity. The secondary outcome was vaccine immunogenicity evaluated by anti RBD IgG ELISA, molecular neutralization test of RBD:hACE2 interaction, live virus neutralization test and specific T cells response. Results The most frequent AE was local pain, other AEs had frequencies lower than 5%. No serious related AEs were reported. Phase IIa confirmed the safety results in 60 to 80 years subjects. In phase I SOBERANA 02 25 microg elicited higher immune response than SOBERANA 02 15 microg; in consequence, the higher dose progressed to phase IIa. Phase IIa results confirmed the immunogenicity of SOBERANA 02 25 microg. even in 60 to 80 age range. Two doses of SOBERANA02 25 microg elicited an immune response similar to that of the Cuban Convalescent Serum Panel; it was higher after both the homologous and heterologous third doses; the heterologous scheme showing a higher immunological response. Conclusions SOBERANA 02 was safe and immunogenic in persons aged 19 to 80 years, eliciting neutralizing antibodies and specific T cell response. Highest immune responses were obtained in the heterologous three doses protocol. Trial registry: https://rpcec.sld.cu/trials/RPCEC00000340 and https://rpcec.sld.cu/trials/RPCEC00000347

Efficacy and Safety of SOBERANA 02, a COVID-19 conjugate vaccine in heterologous three doses combination (preprint)

Background: SOBERANA 02 is a COVID19 conjugate vaccine (recombinant RBD conjugated to tetanus toxoid). Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials demonstrated its high immunogenicity, promoting neutralizing IgG together with specific T-cell response. A third dose of SOBERANA Plus (SARS-CoV-2 RBD-dimer) further increased the specific anti-RBD neutralizing antibodies. Methods: In a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial we randomly assigned 44 031 participants, aged 19-80 years to three groups in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive 28 days apart either a) two doses of 25 microg SOBERANA 02, or b) two doses of 25 microg SOBERANA 02 followed by a third dose of 50 microg SOBERANA Plus, or c) two doses of placebo. Reported study endpoints are vaccine efficacy (VE) evaluated through laboratory-confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 cases and safety. During the trial, the SARS CoV-2 isolates in Havana were predominantly (beta 74.0 %) and shift gradually to delta (100%). Results: Two doses of SOBERANA 02 protects against symptomatic COVID-19: 43 cases in the two-dose group (14 371) vs. 155 in the placebo group (14 403), VE 71.0%, adjusted (CI 95%58.9-79.1). The heterologous three dose combination with SOBERANA Plus protected against symptomatic COVID-19: 15 cases in the vaccine groups (13 833) vs. 155 in the placebo group (14 303), VE 92.4%, adjusted (CI 95% 86.9-95.6%). For two-dose schedule VE against severe COVID-19 was 63.0% and for death 59.0%; for heterologous three-dose schedule, 100% in both cases. Conclusions: This is the first phase 3 study of a three-dose, heterologous vaccine combination against SARS-CoV-2. Two doses of the conjugate vaccine SOBERANA 02 was safe and attained efficacy of 71.0% in adults population 19-80 y/o; incorporating SOBERANA Plus after two doses of SOBERANA 02, increased efficacy from 71.0 % to 92.4% (Clinical Trials IFV/COR/09 number, RPCEC00000354.)

A randomized, double-blind phase I clinical trial of two recombinant dimeric RBD COVID-19 vaccine candidates: safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity (preprint)

Background The Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is the target for many COVID-19 vaccines. Here we report results for phase 1 clinical trial of two COVID-19 vaccine candidates based on recombinant dimeric RBD (d-RBD). Methods We performed a randomized, double-blind, phase I clinical trial in the National Centre of Toxicology in Havana. Sixty Cuban volunteers aged 19-59 years were randomized into three groups (20 subjects each): 1) FINLAY-FR-1 (50 mcg d-RBD plus outer membrane vesicles from N. meningitidis ); 2) FINLAY-FR-1A-50 mcg d-RBD (three doses); 3) FINLAY-FR-1A-25 mcg d-RDB (three doses). The FINLAY-FR-1 group was randomly divided to receive a third dose of the same vaccine candidate (homologous schedule) or of FINLAY-FR-1A-50 (heterologous schedule). The primary outcomes were safety and reactogenicity. The secondary outcome was vaccine immunogenicity. Humoral response at baseline and following each vaccination was evaluated using live-virus neutralization test, anti-RBD IgG ELISA and in-vitro neutralization test of RBD:hACE2 interaction. Results Most adverse events were of mild intensity (63.5%), solicited (58.8%), and local (61.8%); 69.4% with causal association with vaccination. Serious adverse events were not found. The FINLAY-FR-1 group reported more adverse events than the other two groups. After the third dose, anti-RBD seroconversion was 100%, 94.4% and 90% for the FINLAY-FR-1, FINLAY-FR-1A-50 and FINLAY-FR-1A-25 respectively. The in-vitro inhibition of RBD:hACE2 interaction increased after the second dose in all formulations. The geometric mean neutralizing titres after the third dose rose significantly in the group vaccinated with FINLAY-FR-1 with respect to the other formulations and the COVID-19 Convalescent Serum Panel. No differences were found between FINLAY-FR-1 homologous or heterologous schedules. Conclusions Vaccine candidates were safe and immunogenic, and induced live-virus neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. The highest values were obtained when outer membrane vesicles were used as adjuvant. Trial registry https://rpcec.sld.cu/en/trials/RPCEC00000338-En

The Spectrum of COVID-19 in Children in Spain (preprint)

Background: We aimed to identify the spectrum of disease in children with COVID-19, and the risk factors for admission in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs). Methods: : We conducted a multicentre, prospective study of children with SARS-CoV-2 infection in 76 Spanish hospitals. We included children with COVID-19 or multi-inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C) younger than 18 years old, attended during the first year of the pandemic. Results: We enrolled 1 200 children. A total of 666 (55.5%) were hospitalized, and 123 (18.4%) required admission to PICU. Most frequent major clinical syndromes in the cohort were: mild syndrome (including upper respiratory tract infection and flu-like syndrome, skin or mucosae problems and asymptomatic), 44.8%; bronchopulmonary syndrome (including pneumonia, bronchitis and asthma flare), 18.5%; fever without a source, 16.2%; MIS-C, 10.6%; and gastrointestinal syndrome, 10%. In hospitalized children, the proportions were: 28.5%, 25.7%, 16.5%, 19.1% and 10.2%, respectively. Risk factors associated with PICU admission were MIS-C (odds ratio [OR]: 37.5,95% CI 22.7 to 57.8), moderate or severe liver disease (OR: 9,95% CI 1.6 to 47.6), chronic cardiac disease (OR: 4.8,95% CI 1.8 to 13) and asthma or recurrent wheezing (OR: 2.8,95% CI 1.3 to 5.8). However, asthmatic children were admitted into the PICU due to MIS-C or pneumonia, not due to asthma flare. Conclusion: Hospitalized children with COVID-19 usually present as one of five major clinical phenotypes of decreasing severity. Risk factors for PICU include MIS-C, elevation of inflammation biomarkers, asthma, moderate or severe liver disease and cardiac disease.

Minimizing Errors in RT-PCR Detection and Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA for Wastewater Surveillance (preprint)

Wastewater surveillance for pathogens using the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is an effective, resource-efficient tool for gathering additional community-level public health information, including the incidence and/or prevalence and trends of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater may provide an early-warning signal of COVID-19 infections in a community. The capacity of the world’s environmental microbiology and virology laboratories for SARS-CoV-2 RNA characterization in wastewater is rapidly increasing. However, there are no standardized protocols nor harmonized quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) procedures for SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance. This paper is a technical review of factors that can lead to false-positive and -negative errors in the surveillance of SARS-CoV-2, culminating in recommendations and strategies that can be implemented to identify and mitigate these errors. Recommendations include, stringent QA/QC measures, representative sampling approaches, effective virus concentration and efficient RNA extraction, amplification inhibition assessment, inclusion of sample processing controls, and considerations for RT-PCR assay selection and data interpretation. Clear data interpretation guidelines (e.g., determination of positive and negative samples) are critical, particularly during a low incidence of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater. Corrective and confirmatory actions must be in place for inconclusive and/or potentially significant results (e.g., initial onset or reemergence of COVID-19 in a community). It will also be prudent to perform inter-laboratory comparisons to ensure results are reliable and interpretable for ongoing and retrospective analyses. The strategies that are recommended in this review aim to improve SARS-CoV-2 characterization for wastewater surveillance applications. A silver lining of the COVID-19 pandemic is that the efficacy of wastewater surveillance was demonstrated during this global crisis. In the future, wastewater will play an important role in the surveillance of a range of other communicable diseases.

Redesigning SARS-CoV-2 clinical RT-qPCR assays for wastewater RT-ddPCR (preprint)

COVID-19 wastewater surveillance has gained widespread acceptance to monitor community infection trends. Wastewater samples primarily differ from clinical samples by having low viral concentrations due to dilution, and high levels of PCR inhibitors. Therefore, wastewater samples should be processed by appropriately designed and optimized molecular workflows to accurately quantify targets. Digital PCR has shown to be more sensitive and resilient to environmental matrix inhibition. However, most SARS-CoV-2 assays have been designed for clinical use on RT-qPCR instruments, then adopted to digital PCR platforms. But it is unknown whether clinical RT-qPCR assays are adequate to use on digital PCR platforms. Here we designed an N and E gene multiplex (ddCoV_N and ddCoV_E) specifically for RT-ddPCR and benchmarked them against the nCoV_N2 and E_Sarbeco assays. ddCoV_N and ddCoV_E have equivalent limits of detections and wastewater sample concentrations to NCoV_N2 and E_Sarbeco but showed improved signal-to-noise ratios that eased interpretation and ability to multiplex. From GISAID downloaded unique sequences analyzed, 2.12% and 0.83% present a mismatch or would not be detected by the used primer/probe combination for the ddCoV_N and ddCoV_E, respectively.

A single dose of SARS CoV 2 FINLAY FR 1A dimeric RBD recombinant vaccine enhances neutralization response in COVID19 convalescents, with excellent safety profile. A preliminary report of an open-label phase 1 clinical trial (preprint)

We evaluated response to a single dose of the FINLAY FR 1A recombinant dimeric RBD base vaccine during a phase I clinical trial with 30 COVID 19 convalescents, to test its capacity for boosting natural immunity. This short report shows: a) an excellent safety profile one month after vaccination for all participants, similar to that previously found during vaccination of naive individuals; b) a single dose of vaccine induces a 20 fold increase in antibody response one week after vaccination and remarkably 4 fold higher virus neutralization compared to the median obtained for Cuban convalescent serum panel. These preliminary results prompt initiation of a phase II trial in order to establish a general vaccination protocol for convalescents.

Seroprevalence and Neutralizing Activity of IgG Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 in Mexico (preprint)

Background: Until recently, the incidence of COVID-19 was primarily estimated using molecular diagnostic methods. However, it is internationally accepted that the number of cases is vastly underreported using these methods. Antibody prevalence studies estimate cumulative infection incidences and allow monitoring of transmission dynamics, and the presence of neutralizing antibodies in the population.Methods: In February 2020, the Mexican Social Security Institute began conducting anonymous unrelated sampling of residual sera from specimens collected in clinical laboratories and blood banks across all 32 of the country’s states. Sampling was carried out weekly and began 17 days before Mexico’s first officially confirmed case. The 14,515 sera obtained were analyzed by chemiluminescent-linked immunosorbent assay (CLIA) IgG S1/S2 to determine the presence of total IgG antibodies and, later, positive cases using this technique were also analyzed to determine the rate of neutralization using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).Findings: We identified 40 CLIA IgG positive cases before the first official report of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Mexico. The national seroprevalence was 3∙5% in February and 21∙7% in August. Neutralizing activity among patients who generate IgG antibodies was 87∙9% in August 2020 and 10∙4% during the overall study period.Interpretation: The actual extent of the SARS-CoV-2 infection in Mexico is 21 times higher than that reported by molecular techniques. Although the general population is still far from achieving herd immunity, epidemiological indicators of disease burden, and fatality should be re-estimated based on serological studies of this type.Funding Statement: National Council of Science and Technology (CONACyT).Declaration of Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interests to declare.Ethics Approval Statement: This protocol was approved by the scientific, ethics, and biosafety committees of the IMSS National Scientific Research Commission (R-785-2020-60).

Wastewater SARS-CoV-2 Concentration and Loading Variability from Grab and 24-Hour Composite Samples (preprint)

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) requires a significant, coordinated public health response. Assessing case density and spread of infection is critical and relies largely on clinical testing data. However, clinical testing suffers from known limitations, including test availability and a bias towards enumerating only symptomatic individuals. Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) has gained widespread support as a potential complement to clinical testing for assessing COVID-19 infections at the community scale. The efficacy of WBE hinges on the ability to accurately characterize SARS-CoV-2 concentrations in wastewater. To date, a variety of sampling schemes have been used without consensus around the appropriateness of grab or composite sampling. Here we address a key WBE knowledge gap by examining the variability of SARS-CoV-2 concentrations in wastewater grab samples collected every 2 hours for 72 hours compared with corresponding 24-hour flow-weighted composite samples. Results show relatively low variability (mean for all assays = 741 copies 100 mL-1, standard deviation = 508 copies 100 mL-1) for grab sample concentrations, and good agreement between most grab samples and their respective composite (mean deviation from composite = 159 copies 100 mL-1). When SARS-CoV-2 concentrations are used to calculate viral load, the discrepancy between grabs (log10 difference = 12.0) or a grab and its associated composite (log10 difference = 11.8) are amplified. A similar effect is seen when estimating carrier prevalence in a catchment population with median estimates based on grabs ranging 62-1853 carriers. Findings suggest that grab samples may be sufficient to characterize SARS-CoV-2 concentrations, but additional calculations using these data may be sensitive to grab sample variability and warrant the use of flow-weighted composite sampling. These data inform future WBE work by helping determine the most appropriate sampling scheme and facilitate sharing of datasets between studies via consistent methodology.